Human rights and critical social work : competing epistemologies for practice

  • Jim Ife
  • , Sonia Magdalena Tascon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The paper argues that the idea of human rights remains a 'two-edged sword' for critical social work practice. On one hand, human rights implies a progressive stance for critical social workers. However, human rights can be used to maintain conservative perspectives on critical social work reinforcing the neoliberal status quo. The paper analyses literature critiquing human rights theory as a Western-centric development perspective concluding that critical social work practice can benefit from an understanding of human rights that seeks to challenge top-down approaches to human rights implementation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)27-31
Number of pages5
JournalSocial Alternatives
Volume35
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2016

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Human rights and critical social work : competing epistemologies for practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this