"I have a patent lawyer on my payroll" : intellect v. intellectual property rights : a battle over the cultural commons

James Arvanitakis

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Over the last 20 years, markets have come to dominate the way ‘resources’ are managed. The expansion of the market doctrine has at its core the belief that appropriate private property rights are the best way to promote innovation and protect freedoms. The scramble over private property rights is now well entrenched in the intellectual property arena, with countless examples of patents entering areas that once seemed inconceivable. This article moves from Bollier’s (2002) discussion of the concept to argue that intellect, rather than being a commodity that is promoted by private property rights, is rather a commons – more specifically a ‘cultural commons’. As such, the process of commodification turns intellect into intellectual property – limiting its availability. As a commons, if intellect is to be promoted, it must be open and shared in the public sphere. In contrast to the ongoing commodification of all aspects of life, social movements and academics are beginning to rediscover the commons. This rediscovery now takes the battle between the dominant forces of free market fundamentalism and those who oppose them, into the cultural sphere.
    Original languageEnglish
    Number of pages13
    JournalPacific Journalism Review
    Publication statusPublished - 2004

    Keywords

    • inellect
    • intellectual property
    • marketing
    • patents

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of '"I have a patent lawyer on my payroll" : intellect v. intellectual property rights : a battle over the cultural commons'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this