TY - JOUR
T1 - Identifying subgroups with differential levels of service response to a digital screening and service navigation program for unmet social care needs
AU - John, James R.
AU - Winata, Teresa
AU - Wang, Si
AU - Smead, Melissa
AU - Wu, Weng Tong
AU - Kohlhoff, Jane
AU - Schmied, Virginia
AU - Jalaludin, Bin
AU - Lawson, Kenny
AU - Liaw, Siaw Teng
AU - Lingam, Raghu
AU - Page, Andrew
AU - Lam-Cassettari, Christa
AU - Boydell, Katherine
AU - Lin, Ping I.
AU - Katz, Ilan
AU - Dadich, Ann
AU - Raman, Shanti
AU - Grace, Rebekah
AU - Doyle, Aunty Kerrie
AU - McClean, Tom
AU - Di Mento, Blaise
AU - Preddy, John
AU - Woolfenden, Susan
AU - Eapen, Valsamma
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 Public Library of Science. All rights reserved.
PY - 2026/1
Y1 - 2026/1
N2 - BACKGROUND: Digital screening and navigation interventions are increasingly integrated into health systems to identify and support families' unmet social care needs, yet their effectiveness in improving outcomes remains unclear among priority population communities. We hypothesise that responses to such digital interventions might vary based on sociodemographic and psychosocial characteristics. METHODS: Data were analysed from 288 participants in a randomised controlled trial evaluating Watch Me Grow-Electronic - a digital screening and service navigation model to identify psychosocial needs, parental wellbeing, and child developmental needs in South Western Sydney (urban site) and Murrumbidgee (regional/rural site), New South Wales, Australia. Latent class analysis was used to identify subgroups of families based on parental and child clinical and sociodemographic factors. A zero-inflated negative binomial regression was conducted to assess changes in unmet needs, stratified by class and intervention group. RESULTS: Three distinct classes were identified. Class 1 (n = 134) included people who were entirely non-culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) background, in good mental health, with higher education and socioeconomic status (SES), and from the regional/rural site. Class 2 (n = 94) included people who were predominantly non-CALD, of low education and SES, had poor mental health, and from the regional/rural site. Class 3 (n = 56) included people of CALD, high SES and education, and good mental health, who were from the urban site. Compared to the Class 3, participants in Class 2 showed significantly higher needs, indicating that the intervention was not effective in this vulnerable group. DISCUSSION: Digital navigation tools might support families that experience lower psychosocial adversity but are insufficient for families that experience higher levels of adversity, highlighting the need for tiered approaches to ensure equity.
AB - BACKGROUND: Digital screening and navigation interventions are increasingly integrated into health systems to identify and support families' unmet social care needs, yet their effectiveness in improving outcomes remains unclear among priority population communities. We hypothesise that responses to such digital interventions might vary based on sociodemographic and psychosocial characteristics. METHODS: Data were analysed from 288 participants in a randomised controlled trial evaluating Watch Me Grow-Electronic - a digital screening and service navigation model to identify psychosocial needs, parental wellbeing, and child developmental needs in South Western Sydney (urban site) and Murrumbidgee (regional/rural site), New South Wales, Australia. Latent class analysis was used to identify subgroups of families based on parental and child clinical and sociodemographic factors. A zero-inflated negative binomial regression was conducted to assess changes in unmet needs, stratified by class and intervention group. RESULTS: Three distinct classes were identified. Class 1 (n = 134) included people who were entirely non-culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) background, in good mental health, with higher education and socioeconomic status (SES), and from the regional/rural site. Class 2 (n = 94) included people who were predominantly non-CALD, of low education and SES, had poor mental health, and from the regional/rural site. Class 3 (n = 56) included people of CALD, high SES and education, and good mental health, who were from the urban site. Compared to the Class 3, participants in Class 2 showed significantly higher needs, indicating that the intervention was not effective in this vulnerable group. DISCUSSION: Digital navigation tools might support families that experience lower psychosocial adversity but are insufficient for families that experience higher levels of adversity, highlighting the need for tiered approaches to ensure equity.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105026933376&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0332790
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0332790
M3 - Article
C2 - 41499590
AN - SCOPUS:105026933376
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 21
SP - e0332790
JO - PLoS One
JF - PLoS One
IS - 1 January
M1 - e0332790
ER -