Abstract
Implicated within the relationship between memory and identities at the local, national and international levels is the question of whether there is ââ"šÂ¬Ã‹Å“right to memoryââ"šÂ¬Ã¢"žÂ¢: the human right to have the otherness of the past acknowledged through the creation of symbolic and cultural acts, utterances and expressions. This article outlines the rationale for a right to memory and why the debate is of importance to memory and cultural studies. It outlines some of the relationships understood between memory and identity within memory studies, suggesting that a right to memory requires an understanding of the complex dynamics of memory and identities not only within, but internationally across, borders. It extends the concept of political cosmopolitanism to use as an analytical framework to enable an analysis of current international protocols, showing how they formulate the discursive relationship between identity and memory in four ways that involve a number of contradictions and unresolved tensions.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | European Journal of Cultural Studies |
| Publication status | Published - 2011 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- cosmopolitanism
- cultural memory
- identity
- international law
- memory
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Identity, memory and cosmopolitanism : the otherness of the past and a right to memory?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver