TY - JOUR
T1 - IMI : global trends in myopia management attitudes and strategies in clinical practice : 2022 update
AU - Wolffsohn, James S.
AU - Whayeb, Yasmin
AU - Logan, Nicola S.
AU - Weng, Rebecca
AU - International Myopia Institute Ambassador Group, null
AU - Akerman, Dwight
AU - Altiparmak, Ugur Emrah
AU - Balaji, Janarthanam Jothi
AU - Baraas, Rigmor C.
AU - Benavente-Perez, Alexandra
AU - Bikbov, Mukharram M.
AU - Bullimore, Mark A.
AU - Calossi, Antonio
AU - Chen, Connie
AU - Davila-Garcia, Edgar
AU - Fagerlund, Lovisa Adelaide
AU - Fricke, Timothy R.
AU - Garcia Rubio, Elena
AU - Gifford, Kate
AU - Gus, Patrícia I.
AU - He, Xiangui
AU - Iomdina, Elena
AU - Proskurina, Olga
AU - Tarutta, Elena
AU - Iribarren, Rafael
AU - Jonas, Jost B.
AU - Jones, Debbie
AU - Lan, Weizhong
AU - Montani, Giancarlo
AU - Ohno-Matsui, Kyoko
AU - Osuagwu, Uchechukwu Levi
AU - Pérez Robles, Francisco
AU - Plainis, Sotiris
AU - Romualdez, Millette H.
AU - Santodomingo-Rubido, Jacinto
AU - Gordon-Shaag, Ariela
AU - Shneor, Einat
AU - Steenbekkers, Gabi
AU - Tran, Huy D. M.
AU - Vazquez, Ariolfo
AU - Villa-Collar, Cesar
AU - Wu, Pei-Chang
AU - Zvirgzdina, Madara
PY - 2023/5
Y1 - 2023/5
N2 - PURPOSE. Surveys in 2015 and 2019 identified a high level of eye care practitioner concern/activity about myopia, but the majority still prescribed single vision interventions to young myopes. This research aimed to provide updated information. METHODS. A self-administered, internet-based questionnaire was distributed in 13 languages, through professional bodies to eye care practitioners globally. The questions examined awareness of increasing myopia prevalence, perceived efficacy and adoption of available strategies, and reasons for not adopting specific strategies. RESULTS. Of the 3195 respondents, practitioners’ concern about the increasing frequency of pediatric myopia in their practices differed between continents (P < 0.001), being significantly higher in Asia (9.0 ± 1.5 of 10) than other continents (range 7.7–8.2; P ≤ 0.001). Overall, combination therapy was perceived by practitioners to be the most effective method of myopia control, followed by orthokeratology and pharmaceutical approaches. The least effective perceived methods were single vision distance undercorrection, spectacles and contact lenses, as well as bifocal spectacles. Practitioners rated their activity in myopia control between (6.6 ± 2.9 in South America to 7.9 ± 1.2/2.2 in Australasia and Asia). Single-vision spectacles are still the most prescribed option for progressing young myopia (32.2%), but this has decreased since 2019, and myopia control spectacles (15.2%), myopia control contact lenses (8.7%) and combination therapy (4.0%) are growing in popularity. CONCLUSIONS. More practitioners across the globe are practicing myopia control, but there are still significant differences between and within continents. Practitioners reported that embracing myopia control enhanced patient loyalty, increasing practice revenue and improving job satisfaction.
AB - PURPOSE. Surveys in 2015 and 2019 identified a high level of eye care practitioner concern/activity about myopia, but the majority still prescribed single vision interventions to young myopes. This research aimed to provide updated information. METHODS. A self-administered, internet-based questionnaire was distributed in 13 languages, through professional bodies to eye care practitioners globally. The questions examined awareness of increasing myopia prevalence, perceived efficacy and adoption of available strategies, and reasons for not adopting specific strategies. RESULTS. Of the 3195 respondents, practitioners’ concern about the increasing frequency of pediatric myopia in their practices differed between continents (P < 0.001), being significantly higher in Asia (9.0 ± 1.5 of 10) than other continents (range 7.7–8.2; P ≤ 0.001). Overall, combination therapy was perceived by practitioners to be the most effective method of myopia control, followed by orthokeratology and pharmaceutical approaches. The least effective perceived methods were single vision distance undercorrection, spectacles and contact lenses, as well as bifocal spectacles. Practitioners rated their activity in myopia control between (6.6 ± 2.9 in South America to 7.9 ± 1.2/2.2 in Australasia and Asia). Single-vision spectacles are still the most prescribed option for progressing young myopia (32.2%), but this has decreased since 2019, and myopia control spectacles (15.2%), myopia control contact lenses (8.7%) and combination therapy (4.0%) are growing in popularity. CONCLUSIONS. More practitioners across the globe are practicing myopia control, but there are still significant differences between and within continents. Practitioners reported that embracing myopia control enhanced patient loyalty, increasing practice revenue and improving job satisfaction.
UR - https://hdl.handle.net/1959.7/uws:70698
U2 - 10.1167/iovs.64.6.6
DO - 10.1167/iovs.64.6.6
M3 - Article
SN - 1552-5783
VL - 64
JO - Investigative Opthamology and Visual Science
JF - Investigative Opthamology and Visual Science
IS - 6
M1 - 6
ER -