Immigration detention in Australia: the constitutional incompatibility of the Migration Act's definition and its practical implications

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article examines the constitutional validity of s 5(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth), which includes prisons and remand centres as facilities for immigration detention. It argues that this statutory definition is arguably unconstitutional because it conflates the non-punitive purpose of immigration detention with the inherently punitive nature of imprisonment. The article further explores the High Court's jurisprudence on the matter, the principles of punitive and non-punitive detention, and the implications for the rule of law and individual rights.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)89-103
Number of pages15
JournalGriffith Law Review
Volume33
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Immigration detention in Australia: the constitutional incompatibility of the Migration Act's definition and its practical implications'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this