TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of a multidimensional child cash grant programme on water, sanitation and hygiene in Nepal
AU - Renzaho, Andre
AU - Chitekwe, Stanley
AU - Chen, Wen
AU - Rijal, Sanjay
AU - Dhakal, Thakur
AU - Chikazaza, Ingrid R.
AU - Dahal, Pradiumna
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - The study evaluated the impact of a multidimensional child cash grant (CCG) programme on safe water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) outcomes. The intervention district received a CCG providing 200 Nepalese Rupee per month for up to two children for poor families with children under five, a capacity building component for effective child sensitive social protection, and behaviour change activities in addition to existing standard social welfare services in the form of targeted resource transfers (TRTs) for eligible families. The control district received only TRTs for eligible families. Propensity scores were used in difference-in-differences models to compare the changes over time between the intervention and control groups. The intervention resulted in a 5.5% (p < 0.01), 46.6% (p < 0.001) and 42.2% (p < 0.001) percentage points reduction in the proportion of households reporting drinking water from unimproved sources, having unimproved sanitation facilities, and practising unsanitary disposal of children’s faeces, respectively. However, the prevalence of households practising inadequate water treatment methods did not differ between the intervention and comparison districts. In order to achieve WASH coverage in Nepal, strategies to scale up the intervention need to consider a social protection programme embedding different financial incentive and integrated capacity mechanisms.
AB - The study evaluated the impact of a multidimensional child cash grant (CCG) programme on safe water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) outcomes. The intervention district received a CCG providing 200 Nepalese Rupee per month for up to two children for poor families with children under five, a capacity building component for effective child sensitive social protection, and behaviour change activities in addition to existing standard social welfare services in the form of targeted resource transfers (TRTs) for eligible families. The control district received only TRTs for eligible families. Propensity scores were used in difference-in-differences models to compare the changes over time between the intervention and control groups. The intervention resulted in a 5.5% (p < 0.01), 46.6% (p < 0.001) and 42.2% (p < 0.001) percentage points reduction in the proportion of households reporting drinking water from unimproved sources, having unimproved sanitation facilities, and practising unsanitary disposal of children’s faeces, respectively. However, the prevalence of households practising inadequate water treatment methods did not differ between the intervention and comparison districts. In order to achieve WASH coverage in Nepal, strategies to scale up the intervention need to consider a social protection programme embedding different financial incentive and integrated capacity mechanisms.
KW - Water and Sanitation for Health Project (U.S.)
KW - drinking water
KW - hygiene
KW - sanitation
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/1959.7/uws:49396
U2 - 10.2166/washdev.2018.006
DO - 10.2166/washdev.2018.006
M3 - Article
SN - 2043-9083
VL - 8
SP - 520
EP - 532
JO - Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development
JF - Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development
IS - 3
ER -