Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Impact of high-risk prenatal screening results for 22q11.2 deletion syndrome on obstetric and neonatal management: Secondary analysis from the SMART study

  • Kimberly Martin
  • , Mary E. Norton
  • , Cora MacPherson
  • , Zachary Demko
  • , Melissa Egbert
  • , Sina Haeri
  • , Fergal Malone
  • , Ronald J. Wapner
  • , Ashley S. Roman
  • , Asma Khalil
  • , Revital Faro
  • , Rajeevi Madankumar
  • , Noel Strong
  • , Robert Silver
  • , Nidhi Vohra
  • , Jon Hyett
  • , Charlly Kao
  • , Hakon Hakonarson
  • , Bo Jacobson
  • , Pe'er Dar
  • Natera
  • University of California at San Francisco
  • George Washington University
  • Ouma Health
  • Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
  • New York Presbyterian Hospital
  • New York University
  • University of London
  • Rutgers - The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick
  • Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
  • University of Utah
  • Northwell Health System
  • The University of Sydney
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
  • University of Gothenburg
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: One goal of prenatal genetic screening is to optimize perinatal care and improve infant outcomes. We sought to determine whether high-risk cfDNA screening for 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS) affected prenatal or neonatal management. Methods: This was a secondary analysis from the SMART study. Patients with high-risk cfDNA results for 22q11.2DS were compared with the low-risk cohort for pregnancy characteristics and obstetrical management. To assess differences in neonatal care, we compared high-risk neonates without prenatal genetic confirmation with a 1:1 matched low-risk cohort. Results: Of 18,020 eligible participants enrolled between 2015 and 2019, 38 (0.21%) were high-risk and 17,982 (99.79%) were low-risk for 22q11.2DS by cfDNA screening. High-risk participants had more prenatal diagnostic testing (55.3%; 21/38 vs. 2.0%; 352/17,982, p < 0.001) and fetal echocardiography (76.9%; 10/13 vs. 19.6%; 10/51, p < 0.001). High-risk newborns without prenatal diagnostic testing had higher rates of neonatal genetic testing (46.2%; 6/13 vs. 0%; 0/51, P < 0.001), echocardiography (30.8%; 4/13 vs. 4.0%; 2/50, p = 0.013), evaluation of calcium levels (46.2%; 6/13 vs. 4.1%; 2/49, P < 0.001) and lymphocyte count (53.8%; 7/13 vs. 15.7%; 8/51, p = 0.008). Conclusions: High-risk screening results for 22q11.2DS were associated with higher rates of prenatal and neonatal diagnostic genetic testing and other 22q11.2DS-specific evaluations. However, these interventions were not universally performed, and >50% of high-risk infants were discharged without genetic testing, representing possible missed opportunities to improve outcomes for affected individuals.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1574-1580
Number of pages7
JournalPrenatal Diagnosis
Volume43
Issue number13
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2023
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. Prenatal Diagnosis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of high-risk prenatal screening results for 22q11.2 deletion syndrome on obstetric and neonatal management: Secondary analysis from the SMART study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this