Impact of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel on coronary microvascular function after non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome

James Xu, Sidney Lo, Christian J. Mussap, John K. French, Rohan Rajaratnam, Krishna Kadappu, Upul Premawardhana, Phong Nguyen, Craig P. Juergens, Dominic Y. Leung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Coronary microvascular dysfunction after acute coronary syndrome is an important predictor of long-term prognosis. Data is lacking on the effects of oral P2Y12-inhibitors on coronary microvascular function in non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome. The aim of this study was to compare the acute effects of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel pretreatment on coronary microvascular function in non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome patients. Methods: Hospitalized non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome patients were randomized (1:1) to ticagrelor or clopidogrel. The index of microcirculatory resistance, coronary flow reserve, and resistive reserve ratio were obtained using an intracoronary pressure-temperature sensor-tipped wire. Results: In total, 128 patients were randomized between March 2018 and July 2020. Mean age 59.2±11.8 years, 84% were male, mean Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events score was 93.7±24.5. Intracoronary physiological measurements were obtained in 118 patients (60 ticagrelor, 58 clopidogrel). In the infarct-related artery, the ticagrelor group had lower baseline index of microcirculatory resistance (22.0 [13.0-34.9] versus 27.7 [19.3-29.8]; P=0.02) and higher baseline resistive reserve ratio (3.0 [2.3-4.4] versus 2.4 [1.7-3.4]; P=0.01) compared with the clopidogrel group. A total of 88 patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI; 45 ticagrelor, 43 clopidogrel). The ticagrelor group had lower post-PCI index of microcirculatory resistance (22.0 [15.0-29.0] versus 27.0 [18.5-47.5]; P=0.02) and higher post-PCI resistive reserve ratio (3.0 [1.8-3.8] versus 1.8 [1.5-3.4]; P=0.006) compared with the clopidogrel group. The coronary flow reserve was not significantly different between the 2 groups at baseline or post-PCI. No between-group differences were seen in any of the indices in the non-infarct-related artery. Conclusions: In non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome patients, ticagrelor significantly improved coronary microvascular function before and after PCI compared with clopidogrel. Registration: URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au; Unique identifier: ACTRN12618001610224.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)E011419
Number of pages11
JournalCirculation: Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume15
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel on coronary microvascular function after non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this