"(Im)possible to Prove": Formalising Academic Judgement Evidence in Contract Cheating Cases Using Bibliographic Forensics

Cath Ellis, Ann M. Rogerson, David House, Kane Murdoch

Research output: Chapter in Book / Conference PaperChapterpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This chapter seeks to improve the detection of contract cheating. It explores, specifically, the role that academic judgement can and should play in this detection process. We argue that the judgement of academic teaching staff is vital to the improvement of detection levels. We use the example of bibliographic forensics to demonstrate how academic teaching staff can provide effective evidentiary support to a contract cheating investigation through the use of their academic judgement. We provide a series of practical examples, exemplars and finally a set of recommendations as to how partnerships between academic staff, information specialists and academic integrity officers can improve the probative value, fairness, transparency and efficiency of upholding academic integrity at educational institutions.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationContract Cheating in Higher Education
Subtitle of host publicationGlobal Perspectives on Theory, Practice, and Policy
PublisherSpringer International Publishing
Pages185-198
Number of pages14
ISBN (Electronic)9783031126802
ISBN (Print)9783031126796
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2022
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022.

Keywords

  • Academic integrity
  • Academic judgement
  • Bibliographic forensics
  • Contract cheating
  • Detection

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '"(Im)possible to Prove": Formalising Academic Judgement Evidence in Contract Cheating Cases Using Bibliographic Forensics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this