TY - JOUR
T1 - Improved distances and ages for stars common to TGAS and RAVE
AU - McMillan, Paul J.
AU - Kordopatis, Georges
AU - Kunder, Andrea
AU - Binney, James
AU - Wojno, Jennifer
AU - Zwitter, Tomaz
AU - Steinmetz, Matthias
AU - Bland-Hawthorn, Joss
AU - Gibson, Brad K
AU - Gilmore, Gerard
AU - Grebel, Eva K.
AU - Helmi, Amina
AU - Munari, Ulisse
AU - Navarro, Julio F.
AU - Parker, Quentin A.
AU - Seabroke, George
AU - Watson, Fred
AU - Wyse, Rosemary F. G.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - We combine parallaxes from the first Gaia data release with the spectrophotometric distance estimation framework for stars in the fifth RAVE survey data release. The combined distance estimates aremore accurate than either determination in isolation - uncertainties are on average two times smaller than for RAVE-only distances (three times smaller for dwarfs), and 1.4 times smaller than TGAS parallax uncertainties (two times smaller for giants). We are also able to compare the estimates from spectrophotometry to those from Gaia, and use this to assess the reliability of both catalogues and improve our distance estimates. We find that the distances to the lowest log g stars are, on average, overestimated and caution that they may not be reliable. We also find that it is likely that the Gaia random uncertainties are smaller than the reported values. As a by-product we derive ages for the RAVE stars, many with relative uncertainties less than 20 per cent. These results for 219 566 RAVE sources have been made publicly available, and we encourage their use for studies that combine the radial velocities provided by RAVE with the proper motions provided by Gaia. A sample that we believe to be reliable can be found by taking only the stars with the flag notification 'flag_any=0'. © 2018 The Author(s).
AB - We combine parallaxes from the first Gaia data release with the spectrophotometric distance estimation framework for stars in the fifth RAVE survey data release. The combined distance estimates aremore accurate than either determination in isolation - uncertainties are on average two times smaller than for RAVE-only distances (three times smaller for dwarfs), and 1.4 times smaller than TGAS parallax uncertainties (two times smaller for giants). We are also able to compare the estimates from spectrophotometry to those from Gaia, and use this to assess the reliability of both catalogues and improve our distance estimates. We find that the distances to the lowest log g stars are, on average, overestimated and caution that they may not be reliable. We also find that it is likely that the Gaia random uncertainties are smaller than the reported values. As a by-product we derive ages for the RAVE stars, many with relative uncertainties less than 20 per cent. These results for 219 566 RAVE sources have been made publicly available, and we encourage their use for studies that combine the radial velocities provided by RAVE with the proper motions provided by Gaia. A sample that we believe to be reliable can be found by taking only the stars with the flag notification 'flag_any=0'. © 2018 The Author(s).
UR - https://hdl.handle.net/1959.7/uws:63827
U2 - 10.1093/MNRAS/STY990
DO - 10.1093/MNRAS/STY990
M3 - Article
SN - 0035-8711
VL - 477
SP - 5279
EP - 5300
JO - Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
JF - Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
IS - 4
ER -