[In Press] Application of the childbirth supporter study to advance the birth unit design spatial evaluation tool

J. D. Harte, Athena Sheehan, S. Stewart, M. Foureur

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: Translational research to advance design criteria and apply the Childbirth Supporter Study (CSS) findings to practice. Background: The physical design of birth environments has not undergone substantial improvements in layout or ambiance since the initial move to hospitals. Cooperative, continuously present childbirth supporters are beneficial and are an expectation for most modern birth practices, yet the built environment does not offer support for the supporter. Methods: To advance design criteria, we use a comparative case study approach to create translational findings. Specifically, CSS findings were used as indicators to advance the Birth Unit Design Spatial Evaluation Tool (BUDSET) design characteristics in pursuit of better support for childbirth supporters in the built hospital birth environment. Results: This comparative case study provides eight new BUDSET design domain suggestions to benefit the supporter-woman dyad, and subsequently the baby and care providers. Conclusions: Research-informed design imperatives are needed to guide the inclusion of childbirth supporters as both a supporter and as an individual in the birth space. Increased understanding of relationships between specific design features and childbirth supporters’ experiences and reactions are provided. Suggestions to enhance the applicability of the BUDSET for birth unit design facility development are made, specifically ones that will better accommodate childbirth supporters.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages16
JournalHealth Environments Research and Design Journal
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[In Press] Application of the childbirth supporter study to advance the birth unit design spatial evaluation tool'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this