TY - JOUR
T1 - [In Press] Frailty measures in patients listed for lung transplantation
AU - Montgomery, Elyn
AU - Newton, Phillip J.
AU - Chang, Sungwon
AU - Peng, Wenbo
AU - Jha, Sunita R.
AU - Wilhelm, Kay
AU - Macdonald, Peter S.
AU - Malouf, Monique
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Background: The study aimed to determine whether the addition of cognitive impairment, depression, or both, to the assessment of physical frailty (PF) is associated with the risk of lung transplant (LTX) waitlist mortality. Methods: Since March 2013, all patients referred for LTX evaluation underwent PF assessment. Cognition was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and depression assessed using the Depression in Medical Illness questionnaire. We assessed the association of 4 composite frailty measures: PF ≥3 of 5 = frail, cognitive frailty (CogF ≥ 3 of 6 = frail), depressive frailty (DepF ≥ 3 of 6 = frail), and combined frailty (ComF ≥ 3 of 7 = frail) with waitlist mortality. Results: The prevalence of PF was 78 (22%), CogF 100 (28%), DepF 105 (29%), and ComF 124 (34%). Waitlist survival in the non-PF group was 94% ± 2% versus 71% ± 7% in the PF group (p < 0.001). Cox proportional hazards regression analysis demonstrated that PF (Adjusted HR, 4.88; 95% CI, 2.06 - 11.56), mild cognitive impairment (Adjusted HR, 3.03; 95% CI, 1.05 - 8.78) and hypoalbuminemia (Adjusted HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.82 - 0.97) were independent predictors of waitlist mortality. There was no significant difference in the area under the curve of the 4 frailty measures. Conclusions: The addition of cognitive function and depression variables to the PF assessment increased the number of patients classified as frail. However, the addition of these variables, does not strengthen the association with LTX waitlist mortality compared to the PF measure.
AB - Background: The study aimed to determine whether the addition of cognitive impairment, depression, or both, to the assessment of physical frailty (PF) is associated with the risk of lung transplant (LTX) waitlist mortality. Methods: Since March 2013, all patients referred for LTX evaluation underwent PF assessment. Cognition was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and depression assessed using the Depression in Medical Illness questionnaire. We assessed the association of 4 composite frailty measures: PF ≥3 of 5 = frail, cognitive frailty (CogF ≥ 3 of 6 = frail), depressive frailty (DepF ≥ 3 of 6 = frail), and combined frailty (ComF ≥ 3 of 7 = frail) with waitlist mortality. Results: The prevalence of PF was 78 (22%), CogF 100 (28%), DepF 105 (29%), and ComF 124 (34%). Waitlist survival in the non-PF group was 94% ± 2% versus 71% ± 7% in the PF group (p < 0.001). Cox proportional hazards regression analysis demonstrated that PF (Adjusted HR, 4.88; 95% CI, 2.06 - 11.56), mild cognitive impairment (Adjusted HR, 3.03; 95% CI, 1.05 - 8.78) and hypoalbuminemia (Adjusted HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.82 - 0.97) were independent predictors of waitlist mortality. There was no significant difference in the area under the curve of the 4 frailty measures. Conclusions: The addition of cognitive function and depression variables to the PF assessment increased the number of patients classified as frail. However, the addition of these variables, does not strengthen the association with LTX waitlist mortality compared to the PF measure.
UR - https://hdl.handle.net/1959.7/uws:59875
U2 - 10.1097/TP.0000000000003823
DO - 10.1097/TP.0000000000003823
M3 - Article
SN - 0041-1337
JO - Transplantation
JF - Transplantation
ER -