Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Incidence and risk factors for central venous access device failure in hospitalized adults: A multivariable analysis of 1892 catheters

  • Amanda Corley
  • , Ruth H. Royle
  • , Nicole Marsh
  • , Emily N. Larsen
  • , E. Geoffrey Playford
  • , Matthew R. McGrail
  • , Naomi Runnegar
  • , Robert S. Ware
  • , Nicole C. Gavin
  • , Evan Alexandrou
  • , Marghie Murgo
  • , John R. Gowardman
  • , Adrian Regli
  • , Claire M. Rickard
  • Griffith University Queensland
  • Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital
  • Griffith University
  • University of Queensland
  • Princess Alexandra Hospital
  • University of Wollongong
  • Liverpool Hospital
  • St John of God Health Care
  • University of Notre Dame Australia
  • University of Western Australia
  • Metro North Hospital and Health

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Central venous access devices (CVADs) allow intravenous therapy, haemodynamic monitoring and blood sampling but many fail before therapy completion. Objective: To quantify CVAD failure and complications; and identify risk factors. Designs, Settings, and Participants: Secondary analysis of multicentre randomised controlled trial including patients aged ≥16 years with a non-tunnelled CVAD (NTCVAD), peripherally-inserted central catheter (PICC) or tunnelled CVAD (TCVAD). Primary outcome was incidence of all-cause CVAD failure (central line-associated bloodstream infection [CLABSI], occlusion, accidental dislodgement, catheter fracture, thrombosis, pain). Secondary outcomes were CLABSI, occlusion and dislodgement. Cox regression was used to report time-to-event associations. Results: In 1892 CVADs, all-cause failure occurred in 10.2% of devices: 49 NTCVADs (6.1%); 100 PICCs (13.2%); 44 TCVADs (13.4%). Failure rates for CLABSI, occlusion and dislodgement were 5.3%, 1.8%, and 1.7%, respectively. Independent CLABSI predictors were blood product administration through PICCs (hazard ratio (HR) 2.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24-5.55); and in TCVADs, one or two lumens, compared with three to four (HR 3.36, 95%CI 1.68-6.71), intravenous chemotherapy (HR 2.96, 95%CI 1.31-6.68), and diabetes (HR 3.25, 95%CI 1.40-7.57). Independent factors protective for CLABSI include antimicrobial NTCVADs (HR 0.23, 95%CI 0.08-0.63) and lipids in TCVADs (HR 0.32, 95%CI 0.14-0.72). NTCVADs inserted at another hospital (HR 7.06, 95%CI 1.48-33.7) and baseline infection in patients with PICCs (HR 2.72, 95%CI 1.08-6.83) were predictors for dislodgement. No independent occlusion predictors were found. Modifiable risk factors were identified for CVAD failure, which occurred for 1-in-10 catheters. Strict infection prevention measures and improved CVAD securement could reduce CLABSI and dislodgement risk.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)905-917
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Hospital Medicine
Volume19
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2024
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Hospital Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Hospital Medicine.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Incidence and risk factors for central venous access device failure in hospitalized adults: A multivariable analysis of 1892 catheters'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this