TY - JOUR
T1 - Informing the model of care for an Academic Integrative Health Care Center : a qualitative study of primary care stakeholder views
AU - Ee, Carolyn
AU - Templeman, Kate
AU - Grant, Suzanne
AU - Avard, Nicole
AU - De Manincor, Michael
AU - Reath, Jennifer
AU - Hunter, Jennifer
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Copyright 2020, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers.
PY - 2020/4
Y1 - 2020/4
N2 - Objectives: To engage with local primary care stakeholders to inform the model of care for a proposed academic integrative health care center incorporating evidence-informed traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine (TCIM) in Sydney, Australia. Design: In-depth semistructured interviews, informed by community-based participatory research principles, were conducted to explore primary care stakeholder preferences and service requirements regarding the proposed Western Sydney Integrative Health (WSIH) center in their local district. Setting: Telephone and face-to-face interviews at primary care clinics in Sydney. Subjects: Thirteen participants took part in the study: eight general practitioners (GPs) and five primary care practice managers (PMs). Methods: GPs were recruited through local GP newsletters, closed GP Facebook groups, and snowballing. PMs were recruited through a national PM newsletter. The semistructured interviews were audiorecorded and transcribed verbatim before conducting a thematic analysis. Results: Three main themes emerged: (1) the rationale for "why" the WSIH center should be established, (2) "what" was most important to provide, and (3) "how" the center could achieve these goals. Participants were willing to refer to the service, acknowledging the demand for TCIM, current gaps in chronic disease care, and negligible Government funding for TCIM. They endorsed a model of care that minimizes out-of-pocket costs for the underserved, incorporates medical oversight, integrates evidence-informed TCIM with conventional health care, builds trust through interprofessional communication and education, and provides sound clinical governance with a strong focus on credentialing and risk management. It was proposed that safety and quality standards are best met by a GP-led approach and evidence-based practice. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that participants acknowledged the need for a model of care that fits into the local landscape through integrating conventional health care with TCIM in a team-based environment, with medical/GP oversight to ensure sound clinical governance. Findings will be used with input from other stakeholder groups to refine the WSIH model of care.
AB - Objectives: To engage with local primary care stakeholders to inform the model of care for a proposed academic integrative health care center incorporating evidence-informed traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine (TCIM) in Sydney, Australia. Design: In-depth semistructured interviews, informed by community-based participatory research principles, were conducted to explore primary care stakeholder preferences and service requirements regarding the proposed Western Sydney Integrative Health (WSIH) center in their local district. Setting: Telephone and face-to-face interviews at primary care clinics in Sydney. Subjects: Thirteen participants took part in the study: eight general practitioners (GPs) and five primary care practice managers (PMs). Methods: GPs were recruited through local GP newsletters, closed GP Facebook groups, and snowballing. PMs were recruited through a national PM newsletter. The semistructured interviews were audiorecorded and transcribed verbatim before conducting a thematic analysis. Results: Three main themes emerged: (1) the rationale for "why" the WSIH center should be established, (2) "what" was most important to provide, and (3) "how" the center could achieve these goals. Participants were willing to refer to the service, acknowledging the demand for TCIM, current gaps in chronic disease care, and negligible Government funding for TCIM. They endorsed a model of care that minimizes out-of-pocket costs for the underserved, incorporates medical oversight, integrates evidence-informed TCIM with conventional health care, builds trust through interprofessional communication and education, and provides sound clinical governance with a strong focus on credentialing and risk management. It was proposed that safety and quality standards are best met by a GP-led approach and evidence-based practice. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that participants acknowledged the need for a model of care that fits into the local landscape through integrating conventional health care with TCIM in a team-based environment, with medical/GP oversight to ensure sound clinical governance. Findings will be used with input from other stakeholder groups to refine the WSIH model of care.
UR - https://hdl.handle.net/1959.7/uws:60629
U2 - 10.1089/acm.2019.0321
DO - 10.1089/acm.2019.0321
M3 - Article
SN - 1075-5535
VL - 26
SP - 300
EP - 315
JO - Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine
JF - Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine
IS - 4
ER -