Insider–outsider positions in health-development research : reflections for practice

Jan Ritchie, Anthony B. Zwi, Ilse Blignault, Anne Bunde-Birouste, Derrick Silove

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    34 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Recognising that the stance of investigators could make a major impact on the quality and/or interpretation of development-study findings, a small investigation to explore researcher positions and roles was implemented. This was a subsidiary component of a larger health-development study which aimed to explore the evidence base for psychosocial and mental-health policy formulation and implementation in two conflict-affected, low-resourced countries. Five of the research team were interviewed by a sixth member in an open, semi-structured interview format, and the data were analysed thematically. The primary learning for the team, with wider implications for others in development research and practice, is that if the aim is to produce credible findings from investigations of this nature, it is important to exhibit a high degree of transparency regarding the role and position of each researcher, and an explicit attempt to be reflexive in relation to the associated challenges.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)106-112
    Number of pages7
    JournalDevelopment in Practice
    Volume19
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2009

    Keywords

    • developing countries
    • medical policy
    • mental health
    • research

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Insider–outsider positions in health-development research : reflections for practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this