Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Integrated global assessment of the natural forest carbon potential

  • Lidong Mo
  • , Constantin M. Zohner
  • , Peter B. Reich
  • , Jingjing Liang
  • , Sergio de Miguel
  • , Gert Jan Nabuurs
  • , Susanne S. Renner
  • , Johan van den Hoogen
  • , Arnan Araza
  • , Martin Herold
  • , Leila Mirzagholi
  • , Haozhi Ma
  • , Colin Averill
  • , Oliver L. Phillips
  • , Javier G.P. Gamarra
  • , Iris Hordijk
  • , Devin Routh
  • , Meinrad Abegg
  • , Yves C. Adou Yao
  • , Giorgio Alberti
  • Angelica M. Almeyda Zambrano, Braulio Vilchez Alvarado, Esteban Alvarez-Dávila, Patricia Alvarez-Loayza, Luciana F. Alves, Iêda Amaral, Christian Ammer, Clara Antón-Fernández, Alejandro Araujo-Murakami, Luzmila Arroyo, Valerio Avitabile, Gerardo A. Aymard, Timothy R. Baker, Radomir Bałazy, Olaf Banki, Jorcely G. Barroso, Meredith L. Bastian, Jean Francois Bastin, Luca Birigazzi, Philippe Birnbaum, Robert Bitariho, Pascal Boeckx, Frans Bongers, Olivier Bouriaud, Pedro H.S. Brancalion, Susanne Brandl, Francis Q. Brearley, Roel Brienen, Sebastian Pfautsch, Zhi Xin Zhu
  • Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich
  • Department of Forest Resources
  • University of Minnesota Twin Cities
  • Institute for Global Change Biology
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Purdue University
  • University of Lleida
  • Forest Technology Centre of Catalonia
  • Wageningen University & Research
  • Washington University St. Louis
  • Helmholtz Centre Potsdam - German Research Centre for Geosciences
  • University of Leeds
  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
  • University of Zurich
  • Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
  • Université de Cocody Abidjan
  • University of Udine
  • National Biodiversity Future Center (NBFC)
  • University of Florida
  • Costa Rica Institute of Technology
  • Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia
  • Field Museum of Natural History
  • University of California at Los Angeles
  • Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia
  • University of Göttingen
  • Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research
  • Museo de Historia Natural Noel Kempff Mercado
  • European Commission Joint Research Centre
  • Herbario Universitario (PORT)
  • Compensation International Progress S. A. Ciprogress Greenlife
  • Forest Research Institute
  • Naturalis Biodiversity Center
  • Universidade Federal do Acre
  • National Academy of Sciences
  • Duke University
  • University of Liege
  • Forestry Consultant
  • Institut Agronomique néo-Calédonien (IAC)
  • Université de Montpellier
  • CNRS
  • Mbarara University of Science and Technology
  • Ghent University
  • Stefan Cel Mare University
  • Universidade de São Paulo
  • Bavarian State Institute of Forestry
  • Manchester Metropolitan University
  • Key Laboratory of Tropical Biological Resources
  • Hainan University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

326 Citations (Scopus)
14 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Forests are a substantial terrestrial carbon sink, but anthropogenic changes in land use and climate have considerably reduced the scale of this system 1. Remote-sensing estimates to quantify carbon losses from global forests 2-5 are characterized by considerable uncertainty and we lack a comprehensive ground-sourced evaluation to benchmark these estimates. Here we combine several ground-sourced 6 and satellite-derived approaches 2,7,8 to evaluate the scale of the global forest carbon potential outside agricultural and urban lands. Despite regional variation, the predictions demonstrated remarkable consistency at a global scale, with only a 12% difference between the ground-sourced and satellite-derived estimates. At present, global forest carbon storage is markedly under the natural potential, with a total deficit of 226 Gt (model range = 151-363 Gt) in areas with low human footprint. Most (61%, 139 Gt C) of this potential is in areas with existing forests, in which ecosystem protection can allow forests to recover to maturity. The remaining 39% (87 Gt C) of potential lies in regions in which forests have been removed or fragmented. Although forests cannot be a substitute for emissions reductions, our results support the idea 2,3,9 that the conservation, restoration and sustainable management of diverse forests offer valuable contributions to meeting global climate and biodiversity targets.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)92-101
Number of pages10
JournalNature
Volume624
Issue number7990
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s).

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 11 - Sustainable Cities and Communities
    SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
  2. SDG 15 - Life on Land
    SDG 15 Life on Land

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Integrated global assessment of the natural forest carbon potential'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this