TY - JOUR
T1 - Interactions between stress and performance during the menstrual cycle in relation to the premenstrual syndrome
AU - Ussher, J. M.
AU - Wilding, J. M.
PY - 1992/4
Y1 - 1992/4
N2 - Differences between self-diagnosed premenstrual syndrome (PMS) sufferers and non-sufferers (both oral contraceptive users and normally cycling subjects) on performance, state, and reaction to mild stress at premenstrual or intermenstrual stages of the cycle were examined. All subjects reported increases in arousal and stress in the premenstrual phase but there was a significantly greater increase in reported arousal in the premenstrual phase in PMS subjects than in non-PMS subjects. There were no differences between subject groups on performance during thecycle, or on reaction tostress: for all subjects semanticprocessing on awordmatching test improved premenstrually. No differences were found between pill and non-pill subjects PMS subjects scored significantly higher on the Neuroticism scale of the EPI than non-PMS subjects, and were significantly more ‘A’ typed in personality on aFraminghamNB personality scale. It is suggested that a multivariate model is adopted for menstrual cycle research and clinical intervention for menstrual cycle problems, which would acknowledge the interaction of stressors and underlying cognitive-personality factors in the experience of individual women.
AB - Differences between self-diagnosed premenstrual syndrome (PMS) sufferers and non-sufferers (both oral contraceptive users and normally cycling subjects) on performance, state, and reaction to mild stress at premenstrual or intermenstrual stages of the cycle were examined. All subjects reported increases in arousal and stress in the premenstrual phase but there was a significantly greater increase in reported arousal in the premenstrual phase in PMS subjects than in non-PMS subjects. There were no differences between subject groups on performance during thecycle, or on reaction tostress: for all subjects semanticprocessing on awordmatching test improved premenstrually. No differences were found between pill and non-pill subjects PMS subjects scored significantly higher on the Neuroticism scale of the EPI than non-PMS subjects, and were significantly more ‘A’ typed in personality on aFraminghamNB personality scale. It is suggested that a multivariate model is adopted for menstrual cycle research and clinical intervention for menstrual cycle problems, which would acknowledge the interaction of stressors and underlying cognitive-personality factors in the experience of individual women.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0142077296&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/02646839208403941
DO - 10.1080/02646839208403941
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0142077296
SN - 0264-6838
VL - 10
SP - 83
EP - 101
JO - Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology
JF - Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology
IS - 2
ER -