Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Intersectional disadvantage : exploring differences between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal parents with intellectual disability in the New South Wales child protection system

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Parents with intellectual disability and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander parents are overrepresented in child removal but research has not explored the intersection of Aboriginality and intellectual disability in child protection. Methods: A case file review of 45 parents with intellectual disability (n = 14 Aboriginal and n = 31 non-Aboriginal) engaged in care proceedings in New South Wales was undertaken. Parent and child demographics and investigation triggers and outcomes were compared. Results: Aboriginal parents were significantly younger than non-Aboriginal parents at initiation of an investigation, twice as likely to be investigated due to concerns about parenting capacity, and more likely to have children removed than non-Aboriginal parents. Conclusion: The intersection of Aboriginality and intellectual disability appears to increase the risk of negative encounters with child protection systems. Targeted support for young Aboriginal parents and greater disability awareness and cultural sensitivity by child welfare workers are needed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)170-189
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Public Child Welfare
Volume12
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Intersectional disadvantage : exploring differences between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal parents with intellectual disability in the New South Wales child protection system'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this