Interventions, outcomes and outcome measurement instruments in stillbirth care research: a systematic review to inform the development of a core outcome set

  • Danya Bakhbakhi
  • , Dimitrios Siassakos
  • , Anna Davies
  • , Abi Merriel
  • , Katie Barnard
  • , Emma Stead
  • , Clare Shakespeare
  • , James M.N. Duffy
  • , Lisa Hinton
  • , Karolina McDowell
  • , Anna Lyons
  • , Abigail Fraser
  • , Christy Burden
  • , iCHOOSE Collaborative Group
  • , Soo Downe
  • , et al.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)
16 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: A core outcome set could address inconsistent outcome reporting and improve evidence for stillbirth care research, which have been identified as an important research priority. Objectives: To identify outcomes and outcome measurement instruments reported by studies evaluating interventions after the diagnosis of a stillbirth. Search strategy: Amed, BNI, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and WHO ICTRP from 1998 to August 2021. Selection criteria: Randomised and non-randomised comparative or non-comparative studies reporting a stillbirth care intervention. Data collection and analysis: Interventions, outcomes reported, definitions and outcome measurement tools were extracted. Main results: Forty randomised and 200 non-randomised studies were included. Fifty-eight different interventions were reported, labour and birth care (52 studies), hospital bereavement care (28 studies), clinical investigations (116 studies), care in a multiple pregnancy (2 studies), psychosocial support (28 studies) and care in a subsequent pregnancy (14 studies). A total of 391 unique outcomes were reported and organised into 14 outcome domains: labour and birth; postpartum; delivery of care; investigations; multiple pregnancy; mental health; emotional functioning; grief and bereavement; social functioning; relationship; whole person; subsequent pregnancy; subsequent children and siblings and economic. A total of 242 outcome measurement instruments were used, with 0-22 tools per outcome. Conclusions: Heterogeneity in outcome reporting, outcome definition and measurement tools in care after stillbirth exists. Considerable research gaps on specific intervention types in stillbirth care were identified. A core outcome set is needed to standardise outcome collection and reporting for stillbirth care research.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)560-576
Number of pages17
JournalBJOG : An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Volume130
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2023
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • core outcome set
  • patient and public involvement
  • stillbirth
  • stillbirth care
  • systematic review

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Interventions, outcomes and outcome measurement instruments in stillbirth care research: a systematic review to inform the development of a core outcome set'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this