Abstract
Patent law might seem an unlikely area to inquire into questions, especially critical questions, about human and non-human relations. Patent law seems to reinforce the old distinctions between persons and things, humans and non-humans, in strictly instrumental terms. Non-human animals are simply means to our ends. Although this may be an accurate representation, in this chapter I want to challenge this way of thinking about non-humans as objects of intellectual property rights. I want to draw attention to how the limits of patentability and the patentability of animals are co-constitutive. In other words, the concept of invention needs to be reconsidered in light of the invention of animals.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Law and the Question of the Animal: A Critical Jurisprudence |
Editors | Yoriko Otomo, Ed Mussawir |
Place of Publication | U.K. |
Publisher | Routledge |
Pages | 54-70 |
Number of pages | 17 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9780203071366 |
ISBN (Print) | 9780415683500 |
Publication status | Published - 2013 |