TY - JOUR
T1 - In/visibility on campus? : gender and sexuality diversity in tertiary institutions
AU - Ferfolja, Tania
AU - Asquith, Nicole
AU - Hanckel, Benjamin
AU - Brady, Brooke
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - This paper draws on the largest and most comprehensive Australian research to date that explores the campus climate for sexuality and gender diverse (SGD) people at one university. Using a mixed-method approach that incorporated an online survey open to all students and staff (n = 2395), face-to-face in-depth interviews with key stakeholders (n = 16) and an online document analysis, the study explored participants’ perceptions and attitudes to sexuality and gender diversity on campus, experiences of in/exclusion, (un)safe places, visibility in public online documents, and the campus-based services available to support SGD individuals. The findings point to the ongoing exclusion experienced by SGD people across the university. We show how exclusion serves to silence individuals across multiple levels and how this, in turn, limits the visibility of, and redress for, exclusion, impacting on health and well-being. This tension, we posit, can only be addressed safely and holistically through proactive and strategic endeavours on the part of the institution; without which, exclusion will continue to prevail.
AB - This paper draws on the largest and most comprehensive Australian research to date that explores the campus climate for sexuality and gender diverse (SGD) people at one university. Using a mixed-method approach that incorporated an online survey open to all students and staff (n = 2395), face-to-face in-depth interviews with key stakeholders (n = 16) and an online document analysis, the study explored participants’ perceptions and attitudes to sexuality and gender diversity on campus, experiences of in/exclusion, (un)safe places, visibility in public online documents, and the campus-based services available to support SGD individuals. The findings point to the ongoing exclusion experienced by SGD people across the university. We show how exclusion serves to silence individuals across multiple levels and how this, in turn, limits the visibility of, and redress for, exclusion, impacting on health and well-being. This tension, we posit, can only be addressed safely and holistically through proactive and strategic endeavours on the part of the institution; without which, exclusion will continue to prevail.
KW - Australia
KW - gender identity
KW - sex
KW - sex discrimination
KW - universities and colleges
KW - well-being
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/1959.7/uws:55282
U2 - 10.1007/s10734-020-00526-1
DO - 10.1007/s10734-020-00526-1
M3 - Article
SN - 1573-174X
SN - 0018-1560
VL - 80
SP - 933
EP - 947
JO - Higher Education
JF - Higher Education
ER -