Is corruption always growth-inhibitory? : a cross-national study in non-linear frame work

Shrabani Saha, Girijasankar Mallik

    Research output: Chapter in Book / Conference PaperConference Paperpeer-review

    Abstract

    ![CDATA[Is corruption growth-enhancing than growth-inhibitory? In this article we examine the effect of corruption on economic growth in a non-linear framework by utilising panel of over 150 countries for the period 1984-2009. The principal part of our analysis draws on recently published data about level of corruption reported by International Country Risk Guide. We supplement this with an additional analysis of a second dataset on corruption prepared by Transparency International since the middle of 1990s. Results suggest that corruption levels do not appear to reduce economic growth at all levels. Our analyses confirm that the level of corruption affects economic growth, but this effect is non-linear. Corruption typically enhances economic growth in countries where corruption is low. But once past a threshold, more corrupt practices inhibit economic growth. The results obtained after controlling for fixed effects and endogeneity biases by utilising the system generalised methods of moments (SGMM), the most advanced, robust and well recognised technique in the literature.]]
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationProceedings of the 41st Australian Conference of Economists: The Future of Economics: Research, Policy and Relevance, 8-12 July 2012, Melbourne, Vic.
    PublisherVictoria University
    Number of pages12
    ISBN (Print)9781862726956
    Publication statusPublished - 2012
    EventAustralian Conference of Economists -
    Duration: 8 Jul 2012 → …

    Conference

    ConferenceAustralian Conference of Economists
    Period8/07/12 → …

    Keywords

    • corruption
    • economic development
    • growth

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Is corruption always growth-inhibitory? : a cross-national study in non-linear frame work'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this