Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Is there a correlation between aberrant embryonic crown-rump length growth velocities and subsequent birth weights?

  • M. Mongelli
  • , C. Lu
  • , S. Reid
  • , N. Stamatopoulos
  • , K. Sankaralingam
  • , I. Casikar
  • , N. Hardy
  • , G. Condous

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this study, we tested the hypothesis that anomalous first trimester growth affects birth weight. Four hundred and fifteen women with viable singleton pregnancies at the primary transvaginal scan who had at least two crown rump length (CRL) and birth weight data were included. A linear mixed model was fitted to the Box-Cox transformed CRL values to evaluate the association between the GA and the embryonic growth. For multivariate analysis we included maternal age, height, weight, parity, number of miscarriages, vaginal bleeding, smoking, foetal gender, birth weight, small-for-gestation (SGA) and large-for gestation (LGA) categories at delivery. Smoking appeared to be significant for predicting the initial CRL from the beginning of the pregnancy (p value = 0.013). The SGA foetuses appeared to have slightly slower embryonic growth rates compared to non-SGA (p value = 0.045), after taking into account the effect of smoking on the initial CRL. None of the other variables including subsequent birth weight or LGA category have statistically significant effect on the first trimester embryonic growth curve when tested separately.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)726-730
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Volume36
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is there a correlation between aberrant embryonic crown-rump length growth velocities and subsequent birth weights?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this