Is urethral pressure associated with parity and delivery mode?

Ka Lai Shek, Hans Peter Dietz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: Stress urinary incontinence is the most prevalent type of urinary incontinence and childbirth is a risk factor. The aim of this study is to evaluate the association between delivery mode and urethral sphincter function as measured by the maximum urethral pressure (MUP). Methods: A retrospective study on women seen in a tertiary urogynaecological center for urodynamic testing between January 2017 to December 2019. Women were classified into the following groups: (1) nulliparous; (2) caesarean section only; (3) at least one spontaneous vaginal delivery but no instrumental deliveries; (4) at least one vacuum delivery but no forceps; (5) at least one forceps delivery. Results: The complete data sets of 1238 women were analysed; 1112 (90%) were vaginally parous. Mean age was 58 (18–95) years. Mean parity was 2.6 (0–9); 57 (4.6%) were nulliparous, 69 (5.6%) had only been delivered by caesarean section, 762 (61.6%) had at least one spontaneous vaginal delivery but no instrumental deliveries, 41 (3.3%) had at least one vacuum but no forceps delivery, and 309 (25%) had at least one forceps delivery. Mean MUP was 41.8 cmH2O. There was a significant association between vaginal parity and MUP (P < 0.001). On ANOVA test, delivery mode was significantly associated with MUP. This became nonsignificant on regression analysis, with only age significantly associated with MUP (P < 0.001). Conclusions: The effect of childbirth on urethral sphincter function seems to be largely due to the first vaginal birth. We failed to show an effect of instrumental delivery.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3435-3439
Number of pages5
JournalInternational Urogynecology Journal
Volume33
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is urethral pressure associated with parity and delivery mode?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this