TY - JOUR
T1 - Isatuximab subcutaneous by on-body injector versus isatuximab intravenous plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma
T2 - phase III IRAKLIA Study
AU - Ailawadhi, Sikander
AU - Špička, Ivan
AU - Spencer, Andrew
AU - Lu, Jin
AU - Oriol, Albert
AU - Ling, Silvia
AU - Schjesvold, Fredrik
AU - Berkovits, Alejandro
AU - Hus, Marek
AU - Li, Chunrui
AU - Dimopoulos, Meletios Athanasios
AU - Rajnics, Péter
AU - Beşişik, Sevgi Kalayoǧlu
AU - Hungria, Vania
AU - Custidiano, Maria del Rosario
AU - Parmar, Gurdeep
AU - Leleu, Xavier
AU - Li, Fei
AU - Cerchione, Claudio
AU - Gomez, Cesar
AU - Ishida, Tadao
AU - Mateos, Maria Victoria
AU - Buck, Tondre T.
AU - Leblanc, Richard
AU - Minařík, Jiří
AU - Goldschmidt, Hartmut
AU - Zhang, Rick
AU - Sémiond, Dorothée
AU - Suzan, Florence
AU - Stefanova-Urena, Maya
AU - Koch, Victorine
AU - Moreau, Philippe
PY - 2025/8/1
Y1 - 2025/8/1
N2 - PURPOSE: To report the results of the multicenter, open-label IRAKLIA trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05405166) of isatuximab subcutaneous (SC) versus intravenous (IV), plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone, in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM), to our knowledge, the first phase III MM trial using an on-body injector (OBI). METHODS: Patients with ≥1 prior line of therapy were randomly assigned 1:1 to Isa OBI (1,400 mg) or IV (10 mg/kg) once weekly in cycle (C)1 and then every 2 weeks, plus pomalidomide (4 mg once daily, day [D]1-21) and dexamethasone (40 mg once weekly [age ≥75: 20 mg]) and treated until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient request. Coprimary end points were overall response rate (ORR; noninferiority margin, 0.839) and Isa Ctrough (C6D1 predose; noninferiority margin, 0.8). Noninferiority of OBI versus IV was demonstrated if both coprimary end points achieved noninferiority.RESULTSIRAKLIA randomly assigned 531 patients (OBI, n=263; IV, n=268). After 12-month median follow-up, the ORR was 71.1% (OBI) and 70.5% (IV; relative risk, 1.008 [95% CI, 0.903 to 1.126]; lower CI exceeded noninferiority margin). The mean (standard deviation) C6D1 Ctrough was 499 (259) μg/mL (OBI) and 340 (169) μg/mL (IV). The Ctrough geometric mean ratio (90% CI) was 1.532 (1.316 to 1.784); lower CI exceeded noninferiority margin. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse event incidences were 81.7% (OBI) and 76.1% (IV); infusion reaction incidences were 1.5% and 25.0%. Injection site reactions occurred in 0.4% of OBI injections (all grade 1-2); 99.9% of injections completed without interruption.CONCLUSIONIRAKLIA demonstrated efficacy and pharmacokinetic noninferiority between Isa OBI and IV. No unexpected safety signal was observed, with excellent local tolerability of Isa OBI. Efficacy and safety were comparable with Isa IV in ICARIA-MM, except the lower OBI infusion reaction rate. These results support potential use of the OBI, designed to improve practice efficiency.
AB - PURPOSE: To report the results of the multicenter, open-label IRAKLIA trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05405166) of isatuximab subcutaneous (SC) versus intravenous (IV), plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone, in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM), to our knowledge, the first phase III MM trial using an on-body injector (OBI). METHODS: Patients with ≥1 prior line of therapy were randomly assigned 1:1 to Isa OBI (1,400 mg) or IV (10 mg/kg) once weekly in cycle (C)1 and then every 2 weeks, plus pomalidomide (4 mg once daily, day [D]1-21) and dexamethasone (40 mg once weekly [age ≥75: 20 mg]) and treated until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient request. Coprimary end points were overall response rate (ORR; noninferiority margin, 0.839) and Isa Ctrough (C6D1 predose; noninferiority margin, 0.8). Noninferiority of OBI versus IV was demonstrated if both coprimary end points achieved noninferiority.RESULTSIRAKLIA randomly assigned 531 patients (OBI, n=263; IV, n=268). After 12-month median follow-up, the ORR was 71.1% (OBI) and 70.5% (IV; relative risk, 1.008 [95% CI, 0.903 to 1.126]; lower CI exceeded noninferiority margin). The mean (standard deviation) C6D1 Ctrough was 499 (259) μg/mL (OBI) and 340 (169) μg/mL (IV). The Ctrough geometric mean ratio (90% CI) was 1.532 (1.316 to 1.784); lower CI exceeded noninferiority margin. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse event incidences were 81.7% (OBI) and 76.1% (IV); infusion reaction incidences were 1.5% and 25.0%. Injection site reactions occurred in 0.4% of OBI injections (all grade 1-2); 99.9% of injections completed without interruption.CONCLUSIONIRAKLIA demonstrated efficacy and pharmacokinetic noninferiority between Isa OBI and IV. No unexpected safety signal was observed, with excellent local tolerability of Isa OBI. Efficacy and safety were comparable with Isa IV in ICARIA-MM, except the lower OBI infusion reaction rate. These results support potential use of the OBI, designed to improve practice efficiency.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105009921554&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://go.openathens.net/redirector/westernsydney.edu.au?url=https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO-25-00744
U2 - 10.1200/JCO-25-00744
DO - 10.1200/JCO-25-00744
M3 - Article
C2 - 40459178
AN - SCOPUS:105009921554
SN - 0732-183X
VL - 43
SP - 2527
EP - 2537
JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology
IS - 22
ER -