Abstract
Existing accounts of the German strong verbs show notable confusion about their historical development and remarkable diversity with regard to their systemic conceptualisation. Using a principal parts approach, this paper brings out the drastic changes the system of the Germanic strong verbs has undergone since its genesis. In particular, it is shown that the loss of the paradigmatic connection between the phonological root structure of a verb and its ablaut pattern is the key alteration that transformed the strong verbs from a highly homogenous and learner-friendly system to a complicated array of inflection classes whose predictability is no longer based on the citation form stored in the mental lexicon. However, this paper also reveals that it is exactly the remnants of the old system that keep the German strong verbs together as a group and even ensure a limited degree of productivity. The conclusions drawn for a synchronic representation are that the traditional concept of inflection classes, based on the phonological root structure, may be of more value than generally believed and that the conceptualisation of the paradigms of the strong verbs involving stem forms with different ablaut grades as principal parts is supported from the diachronic as well as from the synchronic point of view.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 77-108 |
| Number of pages | 32 |
| Journal | Morphology |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2007 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Modern German
- Principal parts generalisation hypothesis
- Strong verbs
- Word and paradigm morphology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Islands of resilience: The history of the German strong verbs from a systemic point of view'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver