Issues with inclusion and interpretation : a cause for concern in mHealth reviews?

Joseph Firth, John Torous

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We read with interest the systematic review by Wang et al. (2018) on “the effectiveness of mobile apps for monitoring and management of mental health symptoms or disorders”; which sought to identify all studies of mobile apps for ‘mental health in all ages’, across a broad range of outcomes (including mood disorders, psychotic disorders, along with sleep, substance use and suicidal behaviours), including both single-arm studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Given this very broad scope, we were surprised to see the authors included just 16 apps, only 5 from RCTs - particularly given that recent metaanalyses of smartphone interventions focused on single mental health outcomes, such as anxiety (Firth et al., 2017a) and depression (Firth et al., 2017b) identified 9 and 18 RCTs, respectively, for these outcomes alone.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)193-194
Number of pages2
JournalJournal of Psychiatric Research
Volume116
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Keywords

  • Internet
  • mental illness
  • mobile apps
  • smartphones

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Issues with inclusion and interpretation : a cause for concern in mHealth reviews?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this