Abstract
The Indian judiciary, particularly the Supreme Court of India, has assumed a formidable reputation. Dubbed 'the most powerful court in the world', the Supreme Court has issued landmark decisions holding constitutional amendments unconstitutional, recognising unenumerated socioeconomic rights and devising a range of procedural innovations to enforce fundamental rights. Yet, as I have written elsewhere, the judiciary has not consistently held powerful actors to account. For instance, courts have largely deferred to the executive on emergency regulations, and defined secularism in line with the majority Hindu religion.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Asia-Pacific Judiciaries: Independence, Impartiality and Integrity |
| Editors | Hoong P. Lee, Marilyn Pittard |
| Place of Publication | U.K. |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| Pages | 169-185 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781107137721 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2018 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- judicial independence
- India
- Indian Supreme Court
- unconstitutional constitutional amendments
- constitutional law
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Judicial independence and the rise of the Supreme Court in India'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver