Abstract
Questions about the contemporary relevance of juries, their ability to make impartial decisions and their ability to respond to emerging challenges have long been a focus of debate. This chapter considers these questions and explores the extent to which juries continue to ensure that an accused person receives a fair trial. Whilst jury processes remained largely unchanged throughout the twentieth century, jurors have evolved in the twenty-first century-becoming more highly educated and with access to information through technology in the palm of the hand. Access to digital information can both enhance and pollute a criminal trial. This chapter advocates reforms to ensure jurors are kept engaged and active, are well informed through written collaborative jury directions, and deliberate more thoroughly without being tempted to seek their own digital advice.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Australian Courts |
| Subtitle of host publication | Controversies, Challenges and Change |
| Editors | Marg Camilleri, Alistair Harkness |
| Place of Publication | Switzerland |
| Publisher | Springer |
| Pages | 45-64 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9783031190636 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9783031190629 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Editor(s)(if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Contempt of court
- Juries and jurors
- Jury trials
- Justice outcomes
- Social media
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Juries in the digital age : managing juror online and social media use during trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver