Just price and fair value - a null hypothesis supported

Gabriel Donleavy

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    This paper seeks answers to the question of where did the idea of the fairness in fair value originate. It is possible that there is some inheritance of the moral approbation inherent in the medieval idea of the just price. However the context and assumptions of the two notions are so very different that the journey from just price to fair value over some eight centuries cannot be just assumed to be along one single unbroken line. This article summarises the process of dilution of the medieval idea of just price and the judicial development of the modern idea of fair value and discusses the extent to which the former can be shown, if at all, to have germinated or nurtured the early development of the latter. The conclusion is tentatively drawn that the two notions lack detectable interaction or association historically and the whiff of moral approbation that both enjoy is entirely coincidental.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)173-185
    Number of pages13
    JournalInternational Journal of Arts and Commerce
    Volume2
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Keywords

    • Chesterfield's case
    • fair value
    • just price
    • positive theology
    • school of salamanca

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Just price and fair value - a null hypothesis supported'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this