Kant on truth

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    4 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This essay discusses Kant's account of truth, arguing that he offers us a weak coherence theory: weak for his insistence on an independent, sensuous content for intuition, coherentist for the transcendental apparatus supporting experience. While Kant is free to use the language of correspondence within experience, "empirical truth" will always be limited by the formative requirements set by "transcendental truth." The difficulty, for Kant, is the role played by sensuous content since the sameness of this content in intersubjective experience seems to point outside the conditions of synthesis to a transcendentally real object. While the consequence of this would seem to leave Kant in a contradiction"”denying transcendental realism at the same time that he must affirm it"”we must read Kant's insistence on a merely negative use of noumena as evidence that he adopts the role of the skeptic as a means for maintaining his epistemic goals.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)163-172
    Number of pages10
    JournalIdealistic Studies
    Volume34
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2004

    Keywords

    • Kant, Immanuel, 1724-1804
    • Truth
    • Theories of Knowledge

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Kant on truth'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this