Kenosis and nature : critical notes on Vattimo's and Bubbio's notion of Kenotic sacrifice

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In this paper, I focus on Gianni Vattimo’s and Paolo Diego Bubbio’s notion of kenosis showing that (1) they both understand kenotic sacrifice in a strongly hermeneutical sense, and connect it with a perspectival account of truth and knowledge; (2) they both emphasize that kenotic sacrifice has a fundamentally ethical aspect; and (3) they both maintain that kenotic sacrifice is an “unnatural” act that is implied in the withdrawal of one’s self. However, I intend to show that nature can be understood positively through the notion of kenosis, and that it is possible to envisage an ethical theory that concretely tackles the self-proclaimed centrality of human agency within nature, therefore, implementing an effective and non-anthropocentric form of kenotic sacrifice. In this sense, I conclude by arguing that kenotic sacrifice can primarily be seen as an act of making room for other ways of being.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)57-71
Number of pages15
JournalComparative and Continental Philosophy
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Open Access - Access Right Statement

© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Kenosis and nature : critical notes on Vattimo's and Bubbio's notion of Kenotic sacrifice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this