KRAS mutations and CDKN2A promoter methylation show an interactive adverse effect on survival and predict recurrence of rectal cancer

Maija R. J. Kohonen-Corish, Jason Tseung, Charles Chan, Nicola Currey, Owen F. Dent, Stephen Clarke, Les Bokey, Pierre H. Chapuis

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    48 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Colonic and rectal cancers differ in their clinicopathologic features and treatment strategies. Molecular markers such as gene methylation, microsatellite instability and KRAS mutations, are becoming increasingly important in guiding treatment decisions in colorectal cancer. However, their association with clinicopathologic variables and utility in the management of rectal cancer is still poorly understood. We analyzed CDKN2A gene methylation, CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP), microsatellite instability and KRAS/BRAF mutations in a cohort of 381 rectal cancers with extensive clinical follow-up data. BRAF mutations (2%), CIMP-high (4%) and microsatellite instability-high (2%) were rare, whereas KRAS mutations (39%), CDKN2A methylation (20%) and CIMP-low (25%) were more common. Only CDKN2A methylation and KRAS mutations showed an association with poor overall survival but these did not remain significant when analyzed with other clinicopathologic factors. In contrast, this prognostic effect was strengthened by the joint presence of CDKN2A methylation and KRAS mutations, which independently predicted recurrence of cancer and was associated with poor overall and cancer-specific survival. This study has identified a subgroup of more aggressive rectal cancers that may arise through the KRAS-p16 pathway. It has been previously shown that an interaction of p16 deficiency and oncogenic KRAS promotes carcinogenesis in the mouse and is characterized by loss of oncogene-induced senescence. These findings may provide avenues for the discovery of new treatments in rectal cancer. What's new? Though the two are often considered together, rectal cancer and colon cancer behave differently and require different treatments. Fewer prognostic markers are available for rectal cancer, and indicators such as gene methylation, microsatellite instability, and KRAS mutations, which help inform treatment decisions, may be considered less often in rectal than colon cancer. The authors investigated these indicators in rectal cancers, and found that a combination of CDKN2A gene methylation and KRAS mutation may augur a poor outcome, thereby identifying a subgroup of more aggressive rectal cancers that may develop through the KRAS-p16 pathway.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)2820-2828
    Number of pages9
    JournalInternational Journal of Cancer
    Volume134
    Issue number12
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'KRAS mutations and CDKN2A promoter methylation show an interactive adverse effect on survival and predict recurrence of rectal cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this