TY - JOUR
T1 - KRAS mutations and CDKN2A promoter methylation show an interactive adverse effect on survival and predict recurrence of rectal cancer
AU - Kohonen-Corish, Maija R. J.
AU - Tseung, Jason
AU - Chan, Charles
AU - Currey, Nicola
AU - Dent, Owen F.
AU - Clarke, Stephen
AU - Bokey, Les
AU - Chapuis, Pierre H.
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - Colonic and rectal cancers differ in their clinicopathologic features and treatment strategies. Molecular markers such as gene methylation, microsatellite instability and KRAS mutations, are becoming increasingly important in guiding treatment decisions in colorectal cancer. However, their association with clinicopathologic variables and utility in the management of rectal cancer is still poorly understood. We analyzed CDKN2A gene methylation, CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP), microsatellite instability and KRAS/BRAF mutations in a cohort of 381 rectal cancers with extensive clinical follow-up data. BRAF mutations (2%), CIMP-high (4%) and microsatellite instability-high (2%) were rare, whereas KRAS mutations (39%), CDKN2A methylation (20%) and CIMP-low (25%) were more common. Only CDKN2A methylation and KRAS mutations showed an association with poor overall survival but these did not remain significant when analyzed with other clinicopathologic factors. In contrast, this prognostic effect was strengthened by the joint presence of CDKN2A methylation and KRAS mutations, which independently predicted recurrence of cancer and was associated with poor overall and cancer-specific survival. This study has identified a subgroup of more aggressive rectal cancers that may arise through the KRAS-p16 pathway. It has been previously shown that an interaction of p16 deficiency and oncogenic KRAS promotes carcinogenesis in the mouse and is characterized by loss of oncogene-induced senescence. These findings may provide avenues for the discovery of new treatments in rectal cancer. What's new? Though the two are often considered together, rectal cancer and colon cancer behave differently and require different treatments. Fewer prognostic markers are available for rectal cancer, and indicators such as gene methylation, microsatellite instability, and KRAS mutations, which help inform treatment decisions, may be considered less often in rectal than colon cancer. The authors investigated these indicators in rectal cancers, and found that a combination of CDKN2A gene methylation and KRAS mutation may augur a poor outcome, thereby identifying a subgroup of more aggressive rectal cancers that may develop through the KRAS-p16 pathway.
AB - Colonic and rectal cancers differ in their clinicopathologic features and treatment strategies. Molecular markers such as gene methylation, microsatellite instability and KRAS mutations, are becoming increasingly important in guiding treatment decisions in colorectal cancer. However, their association with clinicopathologic variables and utility in the management of rectal cancer is still poorly understood. We analyzed CDKN2A gene methylation, CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP), microsatellite instability and KRAS/BRAF mutations in a cohort of 381 rectal cancers with extensive clinical follow-up data. BRAF mutations (2%), CIMP-high (4%) and microsatellite instability-high (2%) were rare, whereas KRAS mutations (39%), CDKN2A methylation (20%) and CIMP-low (25%) were more common. Only CDKN2A methylation and KRAS mutations showed an association with poor overall survival but these did not remain significant when analyzed with other clinicopathologic factors. In contrast, this prognostic effect was strengthened by the joint presence of CDKN2A methylation and KRAS mutations, which independently predicted recurrence of cancer and was associated with poor overall and cancer-specific survival. This study has identified a subgroup of more aggressive rectal cancers that may arise through the KRAS-p16 pathway. It has been previously shown that an interaction of p16 deficiency and oncogenic KRAS promotes carcinogenesis in the mouse and is characterized by loss of oncogene-induced senescence. These findings may provide avenues for the discovery of new treatments in rectal cancer. What's new? Though the two are often considered together, rectal cancer and colon cancer behave differently and require different treatments. Fewer prognostic markers are available for rectal cancer, and indicators such as gene methylation, microsatellite instability, and KRAS mutations, which help inform treatment decisions, may be considered less often in rectal than colon cancer. The authors investigated these indicators in rectal cancers, and found that a combination of CDKN2A gene methylation and KRAS mutation may augur a poor outcome, thereby identifying a subgroup of more aggressive rectal cancers that may develop through the KRAS-p16 pathway.
UR - http://handle.uws.edu.au:8081/1959.7/545840
U2 - 10.1002/ijc.28619
DO - 10.1002/ijc.28619
M3 - Article
SN - 0020-7136
VL - 134
SP - 2820
EP - 2828
JO - International Journal of Cancer
JF - International Journal of Cancer
IS - 12
ER -