Abstract
Parental responsibility in Australia is situated within the complex statutory framework that governs family law. Over time there has been a significant shift towards privatised dispute resolution in family law matters, particularly in relation to parenting agreements. The chapter considers the 'best interests of the child' as a guiding principle of the family law system, as well as opportunities for children to participate in both the court and out-of-court processes that have emerged. There have been noteworthy reforms in Australian family law with a focus on parenting. Namely, the introduction of private dispute resolution, the idea of equal shared parental responsibility, and most importantly family violence provisions. Family violence is a prevalent issue within family law matters, adding a layer of complexity to parenting disputes. The chapter explores family violence provisions to illustrate the weaknesses of legal frameworks that segregate child-related matters. In Australia, this separation is largely due to a constitutional framework where parenting disputes are a federal matter, whilst state and territories continue to govern child protection. By illustrating the characteristics and developments in the Australian system, the chapter offers a comparative insight for other jurisdictions facing similar issues in dealing with children and families.
Translated title of the contribution | Parental responsibility in Australia |
---|---|
Original language | Spanish |
Title of host publication | La Responsabilidad Parental en el Derecho: Una Mirada Comparada |
Editors | Nicolás Espejo Yaksic |
Place of Publication | Mexico |
Publisher | Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación |
Pages | 439-499 |
Number of pages | 61 |
ISBN (Print) | 9786075521985 |
Publication status | Published - 2021 |