Legal pluralism : notions of standing and legal process constraining assessment

Donna Craig, Michael Jeffery

    Research output: Chapter in Book / Conference PaperChapter

    Abstract

    In a broad constitutional and governance sense, decisions, and decision-making processes, are ultimately controlled by courts. This chapter discusses the role courts play in the context of both common law and civil law jurisdictions in constraining sustainability assessment and explores the critical issue of legal standing which stipulates who has, and does not have, direct access to courts in relation to the sustainability assessment and the associated decision-making process.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationSustainability Assessment: Pluralism, Practice and Progress
    EditorsAlan Bond, Angus Morrison-Saunders, Richard Howett
    Place of PublicationU.K.
    PublisherRoutledge
    Pages85-99
    Number of pages15
    ISBN (Electronic)9780203112625
    ISBN (Print)9780415598491
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Keywords

    • sustainability
    • assessment
    • environmental management
    • courts
    • judicial power

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Legal pluralism : notions of standing and legal process constraining assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this