Lexically-guided retuning of letter perception

Dennis Norris, Sally Butterfield, James M. McQueen, Anne Cutler

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    14 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Participants made visual lexical decisions to upper-case words and nonwords, and then categorized an ambiguous N–H letter continuum. The lexical decision phase included different exposure conditions: Some participants saw an ambiguous letter “?”, midway between N and H, in N-biased lexical contexts (e.g., REIG?), plus words with unambiguous H (e.g., WEIGH); others saw the reverse (e.g., WEIG?, REIGN). The first group categorized more of the test continuum as N than did the second group. Control groups, who saw “?” in nonword contexts (e.g., SMIG?), plus either of the unambiguous word sets (e.g., WEIGH or REIGN), showed no such subsequent effects. Perceptual learning about ambiguous letters therefore appears to be based on lexical knowledge, just as in an analogous speech experiment (Norris, McQueen, & Cutler, 2003) which showed similar lexical influence in learning about ambiguous phonemes. We argue that lexically guided learning is an efficient general strategy available for exploitation by different specific perceptual tasks.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
    Publication statusPublished - 2006

    Keywords

    • cognition
    • learning
    • letters
    • lexical access
    • perception
    • speech

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Lexically-guided retuning of letter perception'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this