Long-term safety and efficacy of garadacimab for preventing hereditary angioedema attacks: phase 3 open-label extension study

Avner Reshef, Connie Hsu, Constance H. Katelaris, Philip H. Li, Markus Magerl, Keiko Yamagami, Mar Guilarte, Paul K. Keith, Jonathan A. Bernstein, John-Philip Lawo, Harsha Shetty, Maressa Pollen, Lolis Wieman, Tim J. Craig, the VANGUARD Study Group

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a chronic, unpredictable disease. Long-term prophylactic treatments that offer durable efficacy, safety, and convenience are required to assist patients in achieving complete disease control, per international guidelines. We report an interim analysis of an ongoing phase 3 (VANGUARD) open-label extension (OLE) study evaluating the long-term safety and efficacy of garadacimab for HAE prophylaxis. Methods: Adults and adolescents aged ≥12 years with HAE previously participating in phase 2 and pivotal phase 3 (VANGUARD) studies were rolled over to an OLE, alongside newly enrolled patients. Patients received garadacimab 200 mg subcutaneously, once monthly for ≥12 months. The primary endpoint was treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in patients with C1 inhibitor deficiency/dysfunction. Results: At data cut-off (February 13, 2023; N = 161), median (interquartile range) exposure was 13.8 months (11.9-16.3). For the primary endpoint, 133/159 patients experienced ≥1 TEAE (524 events), equivalent to 0.23 events/administration and 2.84 events/patient-year. Garadacimab-related TEAEs (13% of patients, 52 events) were most commonly injection-site reactions (ISRs). No deaths occurred. One patient discontinued treatment due to garadacimab-related moderate ISR. Most TEAEs were mild/moderate; three events were serious (COVID-19, two events; abdominal HAE attack, one event) and not garadacimab related. No abnormal bleeding, thromboembolic, severe hypersensitivity, or anaphylactic events were observed. Mean HAE attack rate decreased by 95% from the run-in period; 60% of patients were attack-free. Almost all patients (93%) rated their response to garadacimab as "good" or "excellent.". Conclusion: Garadacimab has a favorable safety profile suitable for long-term use and provides durable protection against HAE attacks.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)545-556
Number of pages12
JournalAllergy
Volume80
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2025

Open Access - Access Right Statement

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

Keywords

  • factor XIIa
  • garadacimab
  • hereditary angioedema
  • long-term prophylaxis
  • monoclonal antibody

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Long-term safety and efficacy of garadacimab for preventing hereditary angioedema attacks: phase 3 open-label extension study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this