Loss of chance in Australia: Tabet v Gett [2010] HCA 12

Bill Madden, Tina Cockburn

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    The availability of compensation for loss of chance in clinical negligence cases appeared to be available in Australia for a time, even after the conclusion reached by the House of Lords in Gregg v Scott. However, the issue only recently came for consideration by Australia's highest appellate court, which in Tabet v Gett adopted an approach more closely aligned with the majority in Greg v Scott. Unlike the factual background to Gregg v Scott, in Tabet v Gett the patient's physical condition had already crystallized. For that reason, the Australian decision may be of interest to readers in the United Kingdom as some commentators have suggested that a factual scenario similar to that in the Australian case may have given rise to a different outcome.
    Original languageEnglish
    Number of pages5
    JournalClinical Risk
    Publication statusPublished - 2010

    Keywords

    • compensation (law)
    • liability (law)
    • malpractice
    • medical jurisprudence
    • medical personnel

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Loss of chance in Australia: Tabet v Gett [2010] HCA 12'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this