Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Low Rates of Surgical Recurrence Following Ileocolic Resections for Crohn’s Disease in the Biologic Era

  • Hugh L. Giddings
  • , Kheng Seong Ng
  • , Michael J. Solomon
  • , Arteen Arzivian
  • , Craig Haifer
  • , Huiyu Lin
  • , Christian Pappas
  • , David Clark
  • , Anthony Deacon
  • , Graham Radford-Smith
  • , Nargus Ebrahimi
  • , Ann Wu
  • , Mark Lewis
  • , Roscoe Lim
  • , Jennifer Zhang
  • , Abhinav Vasudevan
  • , Kathryn Demase
  • , Jadon Karp
  • , Richard G. Fernandes
  • , Yoon Kyo An
  • Zi Qin Ng, Scott Mackenzie, Lena Thin, Tessa Greeve, Gregory T. Moore, Susan J. Connor, Jane M. Andrews, Miles P. Sparrow, Simon Ghaly
  • Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
  • The University of Sydney
  • Concord Repatriation General Hospital
  • Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
  • University of New South Wales
  • Tan Tock Seng Hospital
  • Department of Surgery
  • University of Queensland
  • Royal Adelaide Hospital
  • Box Hill Hospital
  • Monash University
  • Alfred Health
  • Mater Group
  • Liverpool Hospital
  • Fiona Stanley Hospital
  • Monash Health
  • Liverpool Hospital
  • Crohn’s Colitis Cure (CCCure)
  • Adelaide University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background Ileocolic resections (ICRs) are the most common resections for Crohn’s disease. Historical control groups have often been used for comparison when assessing postoperative recurrence, usually with temporal bias. This study aimed to (1) report contemporary rates of postoperative recurrence requiring repeat surgery (surgical recurrence at anastomosis [surgical recurrence at the ileocolic resection site (SR-ICR)] or surgical recurrence at any site) and the rates of endoscopic recurrence (ER) in the “biologic era”; and (2) determine risk factors for SR-ICR and ER. Methods A retrospective multicenter study involving 12 tertiary Australian centers was performed. Patients (of any age) who had undergone an ICR for Crohn’s disease between 2007 and 2023 were included. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to evaluate clinicopathological risk factors for SR-ICR and ER (defined as Rutgeerts grade ≥i2b). Results Overall, 875 patients were included (mean 38.7 ± 15.1 years, 51% female). Median follow-up was 63.9 months. Rates of SR-ICR were 4.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.8%-6.1%) and 12.8% (95% CI, 8.8%-16.5%) at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Rates of surgical recurrence at any site were 5.6% (95% CI, 3.8%-7.5%) and 15.1% (95% CI, 11.0%-19.1%) at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Early (within 12 months) ER occurred in 24.7%. On multivariable analysis, smoking (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.49; 95% CI, 1.93-6.29) was the only factor significantly associated with SR-ICR. Smoking, positive microscopic margins, and granulomas were associated with ER, and prophylactic therapy and younger age at diagnosis (<17 years) were protective. Conclusions The rate of SR at the ileocolic anastomosis in this large Australian cohort was low, recorded to be 1 in 20 at 5 years. Smoking remains the strongest risk factor for both ER and SR. Histopathological factors influence ER and should be considered in future risk prediction models.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)421-432
Number of pages12
JournalInflammatory Bowel Diseases
Volume32
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2026
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation.

Keywords

  • endoscopic recurrence
  • ileocolic resection
  • post operative recurrence
  • surgical recurrence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Low Rates of Surgical Recurrence Following Ileocolic Resections for Crohn’s Disease in the Biologic Era'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this