Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Making or breaking climate targets: the AMPERE study on staged accession scenarios for climate policy

  • Elmar Kriegler
  • , Keywan Riahi
  • , Nico Bauer
  • , Valeria Jana Schwanitz
  • , Nils Petermann
  • , Valentina Bosetti
  • , Adriana Marcucci
  • , Sander Otto
  • , Leonidas Paroussos
  • , Shilpa Rao
  • , Tabaré Arroyo Currás
  • , Shuichi Ashina
  • , Johannes Bollen
  • , Jiyong Eom
  • , Meriem Hamdi-Cherif
  • , Thomas Longden
  • , Alban Kitous
  • , Aurélie Méjean
  • , Fuminori Sano
  • , Michiel Schaeffer
  • Kenichi Wada, Pantelis Capros, Detlef P. van Vuuren, Ottmar Edenhofer
  • Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
  • International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg
  • Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei
  • Paul Scherrer Institute
  • Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich
  • Utrecht University
  • Institute of Communications and Computer Systems
  • National Institute for Environmental Studies of Japan
  • Ministry of Economic Affairs and Climate Policy, Netherlands
  • Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
  • Centre International de Recherche sur l'Environnement et le Développement
  • European Commission Joint Research Centre
  • Research Institute of Innovative Technology for Earth Kizugawa
  • Climate Analytics
  • PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
  • Technical University of Berlin
  • Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

152 Citations (Scopus)
30 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This study explores a situation of staged accession to a global climate policy regime from the current situation of regionally fragmented and moderate climate action. The analysis is based on scenarios in which a front runner coalition - the EU or the EU and China - embarks on immediate ambitious climate action while the rest of the world makes a transition to a global climate regime between 2030 and 2050. We assume that the ensuing regime involves strong mitigation efforts but does not require late joiners to compensate for their initially higher emissions. Thus, climate targets are relaxed, and although staged accession can achieve significant reductions of global warming, the resulting climate outcome is unlikely to be consistent with the goal of limiting global warming to 2 degrees. The addition of China to the front runner coalition can reduce pre-2050 excess emissions by 20-30%, increasing the likelihood of staying below 2 degrees. Not accounting for potential co-benefits, the cost of front runner action is found to be lower for the EU than for China. Regions that delay their accession to the climate regime face a trade-off between reduced short term costs and higher transitional requirements due to larger carbon lock-ins and more rapidly increasing carbon prices during the accession period.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)24-44
Number of pages21
JournalTechnological Forecasting and Social Change
Volume90
Issue numberPA
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2015
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 The Authors.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
    SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
  2. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action

Keywords

  • Carbon leakage
  • Climate change economics
  • Climate change mitigation
  • European Union
  • Integrated assessment models
  • Regional climate policies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Making or breaking climate targets: the AMPERE study on staged accession scenarios for climate policy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this