Making sense of the evidence : jury deliberation and common sense

David Tait, Meredith Rossner

Research output: Chapter in Book / Conference PaperChapter

Abstract

In this chapter, we describe how the juries made sense of the evidence about railway stations in Sydney, the anticipated target of the attack, the behaviour of the accused in leaving his bag on the train and possible terrorist links with such an attack. This was, therefore, an examination of the strength of the prosecution case, the credibility of the accused and the plausibility of the story he told on the witness stand. Excerpts of the deliberations are reproduced below. We transcribed the verbatim exchanges between jurors, using boldface to emphasise the words that were most germane to the analysis.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationJuries, Science and Popular Culture in the Age of Terror: the Case of the Sydney Bomber
EditorsDavid Tait, Jane Goodman-Delahunty
Place of PublicationU. K.
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
Pages249-271
Number of pages23
ISBN (Electronic)9781137554758
ISBN (Print)9781137554741
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Keywords

  • jury
  • trials (terrorism)
  • criminal evidence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Making sense of the evidence : jury deliberation and common sense'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this