Managing psychosocial risks for project management practitioners in architecture, engineering and construction sectors during the COVID-19 pandemic

This study investigates the emergence of psychosocial risks during the COVID-19 pandemic in the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry. It aims to enhance mental health outcomes for project professionals by identifying pandemic-related stressors, evaluating the role of organisational interventions, and developing a practical framework for psychosocial risk management. Guided by Job Demands–Resources (JDR) theory, the research involved a literature review, expert consultations, and a structured survey targeting AEC project managers. The findings reveal that COVID-19-related psychosocial risks such as work overload, isolation, job insecurity, and blurred work–life boundaries were negatively associated with mental health. Organisational interventions were positively associated with improved mental health. However, the moderating effect of organisational intervention on the relationship between psychosocial risks and mental health was not statistically significant. This study proposes a framework to guide AEC organisations in integrating proactive mental health strategies into everyday project practices. While the data are sector-specific and collected during a crisis period, the implications extend to broader project-based settings. This research offers practical insights for AEC firms, policymakers, and industry stakeholders on supporting workforce well-being through targeted interventions. It also contributes conceptually by linking pandemic-induced stressors to established theoretical models of occupational stress, highlighting the need for sector-specific strategies in promoting psychological safety in high-demand work environments.