Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Mapping the landscape of optometric education in Sub-Saharan Africa

  • Uchechukwu Levi Osuagwu
  • , Tuwani Rasengane
  • , Godwin O. Ovenseri-Ogbomo
  • , Naomi Nsubuga
  • , Pirindhavellie Govender
  • , Thokozile I. Metsing
  • , Sylvester Kyeremeh
  • , Khathutshelo Percy Mashige
  • , DIakité Daoudu
  • , Bernadine Ekpenyong
  • , Stephen Ocansey
  • , Osamudiamen Mc Hillary Ogiemudia
  • , Obialo Iwunze Osigwe
  • , Joseph Afonne
  • , Andrew Wekesa
  • , Oforbuike Onyebuchi Ike
  • , Cynthia Odoemena
  • , Precious Ngozi Uwagboe
  • , Edith Daniel-Nwosu
  • , Isaura Ilorena d’Alva Brito dos Santos
  • Andrew Uma Omaka, Kovin Shunmugan Naidoo
  • University of KwaZulu-Natal
  • University of The Free State
  • University of the Highlands and Islands
  • Makerere University
  • University of Johannesburg
  • Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology
  • University of Calabar
  • University of Cape Coast Ghana
  • Novena University
  • Gregory University Uturu
  • Mzuzu University
  • Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology
  • Bayero University
  • Arthur Jarvis University
  • University of Benin
  • Federal University of Technology, Owerri
  • Universidade Eduardo Mondlane
  • Abia State University, Uturu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Clinical relevance: Advancements in optometric education are essential for addressing the global burden of visual impairment by ensuring a well-trained workforce capable of delivering quality eye care services. Background: The number of optometry schools in Sub-Saharan Africa has significantly increased since 2000, reflecting a growing awareness of the role of optometry in addressing the burden of vision impairment. This report provides a comprehensive overview of the current status, challenges, and opportunities within optometry education in the region. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted from April 28 to 31 May 2024. Data were collected from 32 out of 39 optometry schools across 12 Sub-Saharan African countries, yielding a response rate of 82.1%. Heads of optometry schools provided information on student enrolment, graduates, academic staffing, curriculum, and technological resources through a standardised Excel spreadsheet. Results: Over 75% of the schools were established post-2000, with Nigeria accounting for over 40% of them. Student enrolment numbers ranged from 50 students in Zimbabwe to 3,945 in Nigeria. The curricula varied significantly from 3-year Bachelor degrees (BSc) to 6-year Doctor of Optometry (OD) degrees, with five countries offering postgraduate training. Key challenges included inadequately qualified academic staff, low staff-to-students ratio, and a lack of government recognition and regulation. The use of Learning Management Systems (LMS) was inconsistent, with Moodle being the most commonly used platform. Conclusion: The expansion of optometry education in Sub-Saharan Africa represents a positive development, enhancing the eye health workforce. However, to fully realise the potential of these developments, the implementation of standardised educational frameworks, enhanced regulatory support, and increased investment in developing faculty and technological resources are essential. Collaboration and knowledge-sharing across countries can further strengthen optometric education and practice, thereby reducing the burden of visual impairment in the region.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)282-292
Number of pages11
JournalClinical and Experimental Optometry
Volume108
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Keywords

  • Africa
  • education
  • eye care services
  • optometry
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • training

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mapping the landscape of optometric education in Sub-Saharan Africa'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this