Abstract
This paper examines one of the central complaints regarding Locke's Essay, namely, its supposed incoherence. The question is whether Locke can successfully maintain a materialistic conception of matter, while advancing a theory of knowledge that will constrain the possibilities for a cognitive access to matter from the start. In approaching this question I concentrate on Locke's account of unity. While material unity can be described in relation to Locke's account of substance, real essence, and nominal essence, a separate discussion will be called for altogether in the case of organic unity. In closing, I turn to Kant as a model for locating Locke's purported incoherence, suggesting that his "skeptical idealism" yields the same epistemic advantages as those won by Kant's "empirical realism."
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 147-162 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | Idealistic Studies |
Volume | 40 |
Issue number | 45323 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2010 |
Keywords
- Locke, John, 1632-1704
- Organism
- Nature
- Individuation
- Cognition
- Kant, Immanuel, 1724-1804