Measurement of vulnerability to water-stress induced cavitation in grapevine: a comparison of four techniques applied to a long-vesseled species

Brendan Choat, William M. Drayton, Craig Brodersen, Mark A. Matthews, Ken A. Shackel, Hiroshi Wada, Andrew J. McElrone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

220 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Among woody plants, grapevines are often described as highly vulnerable to water-stress induced cavitation with emboli forming at slight tensions. However, we found native embolism never exceeded 30% despite low xylem water potentials (Ψx) for stems of field grown vines. The discrepancy between native embolism measurements and those of previous reports led us to assess vulnerability curve generation using four separate methods and alterations (i.e. segment length and with/without flushing to remove embolism prior to measurement) of each. Centrifuge, dehydration and air-injection methods, which rely on measurement of percentage loss of hydraulic conductivity (PLC) in detached stems, were compared against non-invasive monitoring of xylem cavitation with nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) imaging. Short segment air-injection and flushed centrifuge stems reached >90 PLC at Ψx of-0.5 and −1.5 MPa, respectively, whereas dehydration and long-segment air-injection measurements indicated no significant embolism at Ψx > −2.0 MPa. Observations from NMR agreed with the dehydration and long segment air-injection methods, showing the majority of vessels were still water-filled at Ψx > −1.5 MPa. Our findings show V. vinifera stems are far less vulnerable to water stress-induced cavitation than previously reported, and dehydration and long segment air-injection techniques are more appropriate for long-vesseled species and organs.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1502-1512
Number of pages11
JournalPlant Cell and Environment
Volume33
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Keywords

  • cavitation
  • grapes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Measurement of vulnerability to water-stress induced cavitation in grapevine: a comparison of four techniques applied to a long-vesseled species'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this