Measuring competence, self-reported competence and self-efficacy in pre-registration students

William Lauder, Karen Holland, Michelle Roxburgh, Keith Topping, Roger Watson, Martin Johnson, Mary Porter, Agnieszka Behr

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    63 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    AIM: To measure competence, self-reported competence and self-efficacy; explore any differences between cohorts and student entry criteria; and explore the relationship between competence, self-reported competence, support and self-efficacy. METHOD: All students undertook a three-station objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) and had previously completed a questionnaire, which included measures of self-reported competence, support and self-efficacy. The performance of two single year cohorts enabled measurement of competence development and progression. RESULTS: Students were competent in the core generalist skills of communication and hand decontamination but demonstrated low levels of numeracy. CONCLUSION: Doubts are raised about the explanatory value or practical use of social cognitive theory in pre-registration curricula and questions are raised about the value of self-reported competence. This has implications for nursing and midwifery curricula, which emphasise the importance of self-assessment.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)35-43
    Number of pages9
    JournalNursing Standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)
    Volume22
    Issue number20
    Publication statusPublished - 2008

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Measuring competence, self-reported competence and self-efficacy in pre-registration students'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this