Mental health implications for older adults after natural disasters : a systematic review and meta-analysis

Georgina Parker, David Lie, Dan J. Siskind, Melinda Martin-Khan, Beverly Raphael, David Crompton, Steve Kisely

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Background: Natural disasters affect the health and well-being of adults throughout the world. There is some debate in the literature as to whether older persons have increased risk of mental health outcomes after exposure to natural disasters when compared with younger adults. To date, no systematic review has evaluated this. We aimed to synthesize the available evidence on the impact of natural disasters on the mental health and psychological distress experienced by older adults. Design: A meta-analysis was conducted on papers identified through a systematic review. The primary outcomes measured were post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, anxiety disorders, adjustment disorder, and psychological distress. Results: We identified six papers with sufficient data for a random effects meta-analysis. Older adults were 2.11 times more likely to experience PTSD symptoms and 1.73 more likely to develop adjustment disorder when exposed to natural disasters when compared with younger adults. Conclusions: Given the global rise in the number of older adults affected by natural disasters, mental health services need to be prepared to meet their needs following natural disasters, particularly around the early detection and management of PTSD.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)11-20
    Number of pages10
    JournalInternational Psychogeriatrics
    Volume28
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2016

    Keywords

    • mental health
    • meta, analysis
    • natural disasters
    • older people
    • post, traumatic stress disorder

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Mental health implications for older adults after natural disasters : a systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this