Microcysts: clinical significance and differential diagnosis

Lisa Keay, Isabelle Jalbert, Deborah F. Sweeney, Brien A. Holden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Microcysts are the most-distinctive and easily detectable indicator of contact lens-induced hypoxia. They should not be confused with cyst-like inclusions that occur in conditions such as Meesmann's dystrophy, bullous keratopathy, and Cogan's microcystic dystrophy, or with mucin balls, vacuoles, microcystic edema, and infiltrates. Methods: Data from published literature and recent data from The Cornea and Contact Lens Research Unit (CCLRU) clinical trials involving low Dk and prototype high Dk soft contact lenses (SCLs) were examined. Results: Extended wear with low Dk SCLs induces significant numbers of microcysts, whereas extended wear with high Dk SCLs does not. Subjects who transfer from low Dk to high Dk lenses have an initial increase in the number of microcysts after seven days that declines to normal levels over 1 to 3 months. Microcysts can be differentiated from other ocular conditions as they show reversed illumination, are 10-to 50-μm irregularly shaped dots, and are often associated with lens-induced hypoxia. Conclusions: Microcysts are easily observed and differentiated from other conditions in clinical practice. On average, fewer than ten microcysts per eye occur in nonhypoxic lens wear and, on average, more than 20 microcysts per eye are an indication of chronic hypoxia. The increase in microcyst numbers after transfer from low to high Dk lens wear is transitory and does not necessitate a period of no lens wear.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)452-460
Number of pages9
JournalOptometry
Volume72
Issue number7
Publication statusPublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Differential diagnosis
  • High Dk
  • Hypoxia
  • Microcysts
  • Silicone hydrogel
  • Soft contact lens

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Microcysts: clinical significance and differential diagnosis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this