Mobiles in-a-box : developing a toolkit with grassroots human rights advocates

Tanya Notley, Becky Faith

    Research output: Chapter in Book / Conference PaperChapter

    Abstract

    The way information is created, accessed, reviewed, contested and used to drive social change has been changing rapidly over the past five years. The rise of Web 2.0 technology and the increasing popularity of user-level tools and services such as YouTube, Flickr and Blip.tv, alongside other non-commercial alternatives such the Witness Hub, EngageMedia and World Social Forum TV, have created greater opportunities for dynamic information sharing, content collaboration and self-publishing. The potential for these tools and services to contribute to human rights advocacy work has increased considerably as new ICT has become cheaper and more accessible to people living in marginalised communities, as well as progressively more interlaced: mobile phones feed into websites, websites become interactive radio stations, and the offline and online world increasingly interconnect. But just as emerging technology brings new opportunities, it also presents new challenges by introducing new methods for suppression, censorship and breaches of privacy. Evolving technology also creates a 'moving target', and the gap between people who have low-cost and high-quality broadband internet and multimedia mobile access in the global North with those who have expensive basic mobiles and infrequent or slow internet connectivity in the global South remains large.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationSMS Uprisings: Mobile Phone Activism in Africa
    EditorsSokari Ekine
    Place of PublicationSouth Africa
    PublisherPambazuka Press
    Pages40-53
    Number of pages14
    ISBN (Electronic)9781906387365
    ISBN (Print)9781906387358
    Publication statusPublished - 2010

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Mobiles in-a-box : developing a toolkit with grassroots human rights advocates'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this